Are Deepening Macroeconomic Structural Contradictions a Good Timing for Risk Assets?

By: blockbeats|2025/12/10 12:00:03
0
Share
copy
Original Title: My Current Bias, in One Line
Original Author: @arndxt_xo, Crypto KOL
Original Translation: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

One-Liner Summary: I am currently bullish on risk assets in the short term due to AI capital expenditure, consumer spending driven by the affluent class, and still high nominal growth, all of which structurally favor corporate profits.

In simpler terms: When the cost of borrowing is low, "risk assets" typically perform well.

Are Deepening Macroeconomic Structural Contradictions a Good Timing for Risk Assets?

However, at the same time, I am skeptical of the story we are currently telling about what all of this means for the next decade:

· Sovereign debt issues that cannot be resolved without some combination of inflation, financial repression, or a black swan event.

· Fertility rates and demographic structures that will invisibly limit real economic growth and quietly magnify political risks.

· Asia, especially China, will increasingly become the core definer of opportunity and tail risks.

So the trend continues, holding on to those profit engines. But to construct a portfolio, it is imperative to recognize that the path to currency debasement and demographic adjustment will be full of twists and turns, not smooth sailing.

The Illusion of Consensus

If you only read the views of major institutions, you would think we are living in the most perfect macro world:

Economic growth is "resilient," inflation is sliding toward targets, artificial intelligence is a long-term tailwind, and Asia is the new engine of diversification.

The latest outlook for the first quarter of 2026 from HSBC is a clear manifestation of this consensus: stay in the stock market bull run, overweight tech and communication services, bet on AI winners and Asian markets, lock in investment-grade bond yields, and smooth volatility with alternative and multi-asset strategies.

I actually partially agree with this view. But if you stop there, you will miss the truly important story.

Beneath the surface, the reality is:

· An earnings cycle driven by AI capital expenditure, the intensity of which far exceeds people's imagination.

· A monetary policy transmission mechanism partially impaired by the accumulation of massive public debt on private balance sheets.

· Some structural time bombs — sovereign debt, collapsing birth rates, geopolitical realignment — may not matter for this quarter, but are crucial for what “risk assets” themselves mean a decade from now.

This piece is my attempt to reconcile these two worlds: one a shiny, marketable story of “resilience,” the other a messy, path-dependent macro reality.

1. Market Consensus

Let’s start with the prevailing view among institutional investors.

Their logic is straightforward:

· The stock market bull run continues, but with increased volatility.

· Industry styles should be diversified: overweight in tech and communications, while also holding utilities (power demand), industrials, and financials for value and diversification.

· Utilize alternative investments and multi-asset strategies to hedge against downturns — such as gold, hedge funds, private credit/equity, infrastructure, and volatility strategies.

Focus on yield opportunities:

· With spreads already tight, shift funds from high-yield bonds to investment-grade bonds.

· Increase exposure to emerging market hard currency corporate bonds and local currency bonds for yield spread and equity market low correlation.

· Use infrastructure and volatility strategies as inflation hedges.

Position Asia at the core of diversification:

· Overweight in China, China Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, South Korea.

· Focus on themes: Asian data center boom, innovative leading Chinese companies, Asian corporate returns enhanced through buybacks/dividends/mergers, and high-quality Asian credit bonds.

In fixed income, they are explicitly bullish on:

· Global investment-grade corporate bonds for their higher spread and opportunity to lock in yields before policy rates fall.

· Overweighting emerging market local currency bonds for spread, potential currency gains, and low correlation with stocks.

· Slightly underweighting global high-yield bonds due to overvaluation and individual credit risks.

This is a textbook example of a "late-cycle but not yet over" configuration: go with the flow, diversify your investments, and let Asia, AI, and yield strategies drive your portfolio.

I think this strategy is broadly correct for the next 6-12 months. But the problem is that most macro analysis stops here, and the real risks only start from here.

2. Cracks Beneath the Surface

On a macro level:

· U.S. nominal spending is growing at around 4-5%, directly supporting corporate revenues.

· But the key question is: who is doing the spending? Where is the money coming from?

Mere discussions of a declining savings rate ("consumers are out of money") miss the point. If affluent households dip into savings, increase credit, or realize asset gains, they can continue to spend even if wage growth slows and the job market softens. The portion of consumption exceeding income is supported by the balance sheet (wealth), not the income statement (current income).

This means that a significant part of the marginal demand comes from affluent households with strong balance sheets, rather than broad-based real income growth.

That's why the data looks so contradictory:

· Overall consumption remains strong.

· The labor market is gradually weakening, especially in low-end jobs.

· Income and asset inequality worsen, further reinforcing this pattern.

Here, I diverge from the mainstream "resilience" narrative. The macro aggregates look good because they are increasingly dominated by the small group at the top of the income, wealth, and capital acquisition pyramid.

For the stock market, this is still a positive (profits don't care if income comes from one rich person or ten poor people). But for social stability, the political environment, and long-term growth, this is a slow-burning hazard.

3. The Stimulus Effect of AI Capital Expenditure

The most underestimated dynamic currently is artificial intelligence (AI) capital expenditure and its impact on profits.

In simple terms:

· Investment spending is someone else's income today.

· The associated costs (depreciation) will slowly manifest over the next few years.

Therefore, when AI super-scale companies and related firms significantly ramp up total investments (e.g., growing by 20%):

· Revenue and profit will receive a significant and upfront boost.

· Depreciation will slowly rise over time, roughly in line with inflation.

· Data shows that at any point in time, the best single indicator of profit explanation is total investment minus capital consumption (depreciation).

This leads to a very simple but consensus-different conclusion: during the ongoing AI capital expenditure surge, it stimulates the business cycle and maximizes corporate profits.

Don't try to stop this train.

This aligns perfectly with HSBC's overweight in tech stocks and its theme of the "evolving AI ecosystem." Essentially, they are also pre-positioning based on the same profit logic, albeit in a different narrative.

What I am more skeptical about is the narrative regarding its long-term impact:

I do not believe that relying solely on AI capital expenditure can usher us into a new era of 6% real GDP growth.

Once the corporate free cash flow financing window narrows and balance sheets saturate, capital expenditure will decelerate.

As depreciation catches up, this "profit stimulus" effect will fade away; we will revert to the potential trend of population growth + productivity gains, which is not high in developed countries.

Therefore, my stance is:

· Tactically: Stay optimistic for beneficiaries of AI capital expenditure (chips, data center infrastructure, power grids, niche software, etc.) as long as total investment data continues to soar.

· Strategically: See this as a cyclical profit boom rather than a permanent reset of trend growth rates.

4. Bonds, Liquidity, and the Semi-Failure Transmission Mechanism

This part has become somewhat eerie.

Historically, a 500 basis point rate hike would severely hit the private sector's net interest income. But today, trillions in public debt sit on private balance sheets as safe assets, distorting this relationship:

· Rising rates mean higher interest income for holders of government bonds and reserves.

· Many corporate and household debts are fixed-rate (especially mortgages).

· The end result: the net interest burden of the private sector has not deteriorated as macro forecasts predicted.

So here we are facing:

· A Fed in a bind: inflation still above target, while labor data softens.

· A volatile rate market: this year's best trade has been bond mean reversion, buying the panic sell-off, selling the rapid rallies as the macro landscape refuses to clarify into a clear "big rate cut" or "hiking again" trend.

On "liquidity," here's my blunt take:

· The Fed's balance sheet now reads more like a narrative device; its net changes are too slow, too small relative to the entire financial system to be a useful trading signal.

· The real liquidity shifts happen on the private sector's balance sheets and in the repo market: who's borrowing, who's lending, and at what spread.

5. Debt, Demographics, and China’s Long Shadow

Sovereign Debt: Known Outcome, Unknown Path

The issue of international sovereign debt is the defining macro topic of our era, and everyone knows the "solution" boils down to:

Devalue through inflation to bring the debt/GDP ratio back to a manageable level.

The lingering question is the path:

Orderly Financial Repression:

· Maintain nominal growth > nominal rates

· Tolerate slightly above-target inflation

· Slowly erode the real debt burden

Disorderly Crisis Scenario:

· Markets panic over fiscal trajectory

· Term premia spike suddenly

· Weaker sovereigns experience currency crises.

Earlier this year, when market nerves about the fiscal pathway sent U.S. long-end yields spiking, we got a taste. HSBC itself noted that the narrative of "fiscal worsening" peaked around relevant budget discussions, only to fade as the Fed pivoted to growth concerns.

I believe this act is far from over.

Fertility Rate: The Slow-Motion Macro Crisis

The global fertility rate has dropped below replacement levels, not only in Europe and East Asia but now also spreading to Iran, Turkey, and gradually affecting parts of Africa. This is essentially a profound macro shock masked by population statistics.

Low fertility rates mean:

· Higher dependency ratios (increased proportion of people needing care).

· Lower long-term potential for economic growth.

· Long-term societal allocation pressures and political tensions due to capital returns persistently outpacing wage growth.

When you combine AI capital expenditure (a form of capital deepening shock) with declining fertility rates (a labor supply shock),

you get a world where:

· Capital owners excel nominally.

· Political systems become more unstable.

· Monetary policy faces a dilemma: to support growth while avoiding wage-price spiral inflation when labor finally gains bargaining power.

This will not show up in institutions' next 12-month outlook slideshows, but it is absolutely crucial for a 5-15 year asset allocation perspective.

China: The Overlooked Key Variable

HSBC's Asian view is optimistic: bullish on policy-driven innovation, AI cloud computing potential, governance reforms, higher corporate returns, attractive valuations, and the tailwind from the region-wide easing.

My view is:

· Looking at a 5-10 year horizon, the risk of zero allocation to China and North Asia markets is greater than the risk of a modest allocation.

· Looking at a 1-3 year horizon, the main risk is not macro fundamentals but policy and geopolitics (sanctions, export controls, capital flow restrictions).

Consider simultaneously allocating to China AI, semiconductor, data center infrastructure-related assets, as well as high dividend, high-quality credit bonds, but you must determine the allocation size based on a clear policy risk budget, not just relying on historical Sharpe ratios.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more